Google is killing first and second gen Nest Thermostats

(support.google.com)

56 points | by eyeareque 2 days ago ago

23 comments

  • BobbyTables2 2 days ago ago

    They could at least have the decency to unlock+open-source the thing.

    Offering a 50% discount on the next generation sounds pretty shitty.

    • eyeareque a day ago ago

      I agree. It would be nice if you could self host your own api, and keep these things from turning into useless hockey pucks

  • ElijahLynn 2 days ago ago

    Damn...

    And also,

    > We’ll reach out to eligible users in the US and Canada for the Nest Learning Thermostat (4th gen) at a special price: $149.99 [219.99 CAD] (nearly 50% off).

    However, we got a Nest from the Oregon Energy trust for $50 I think. So, not a great price.

    • mentalpiracy 2 days ago ago

      Telling me that you’ve unilaterally decided to lobotomize a product I already paid you for, and then thinking that I’d like the privilege of purchasing additional goods from you - even at a discount - is certainly something.

      Gotta juice those numbers before moving on to the next role.

    • protimewaster 2 days ago ago

      This kind of thing drives me crazy, and I think it helps to highlight some of the money-grubbing nature of the tech industry.

      Years ago, you'd buy a cheap thermostat and it'd last 30 years or whatever. But the tech industry had to improve that by instead making them last less than half as long and cost substantially more.

      I understand the idea that smart stuff is cool or whatever, but it feels like it'd be smarter if it lasted as long as the thing they're trying to replace...

      • Fezzik 2 days ago ago

        Those same bulletproof thermostats are still sold everywhere. And are dirt cheap. I blame the consumer more than the producer for the proliferation of these products. This is one area where your options were never limited and you’d have to be a dunce and/or been paying zero attention to how tech companies have operated for decades to think these devices were not going to be made useless at a regular rate.

      • anon6362 2 days ago ago

        It's one of the problems created by allowing billionaire technofeudal overlords to do whatever they want. They believe they are entitled to anything and everything, and so everything they make turns to shit to fool you into maintaining it and rebuying it faster and faster.

        • daymanstep 2 days ago ago

          Planned obsolescence is as old as the light bulb.

          • anon6362 2 days ago ago

            That's a given. It is, but it's not a binary on/off. It's a sliding continuum of enshitification and the current trend is to rapidly increasing towards worse. It rarely/never goes back the other way.

  • gnabgib 2 days ago ago

    Discussion (82 points, 4 months ago, 72 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43802574

  • RedComet 2 days ago ago

    Not very "carbon friendly". But the recycler they mention will probably kindly ship it do a foreign landfill.

  • ravenstine 2 days ago ago

    I am never connecting a thermostat to the internet or using one that strictly requires the internet.

    • msgodel a day ago ago

      I love the idea of an internet connected thermostat running an open source micropython environment.

      No one outside of HongKong ever seems to want to sell devices like that though. I don't know if it's a culture thing or what.

  • danielscrubs 2 days ago ago

    I question how good the engineers are if it costs so much to keep those services running.

    I guess the only way out is to vote with your wallet.

    YouTube and Gmail are the only Google services left in my life.

    • AtlasBarfed a day ago ago

      Tell everyone homeowner you ever meet when talking about homes or real estate about how bad IoT is.

      Destroy the market until they do better.

      • stahtops a day ago ago

        Actually it’s very convenient to have control of the thermostat remotely.

        The lesson here (once again) is just: don’t buy hardware from Google

        • tanseydavid a day ago ago

          Durable goods has become an oxymoron.

          All sellers of devices of this nature will eventually do this, if they can. It is a sad fact in my opinion.

  • staticman2 a day ago ago

    So it looks like these models are over 10 years old

    I'm not trying to be a shill for a trillion dollar company but I'd probably put up with the annoyance of swapping the thermostat once every 10+ years over switching to a different company if I was happy with it.

    • gregors a day ago ago

      If I pay for something and you don't tell me upfront on the box that it only supported until a certain date in big bold letters (like smoke detectors do). I'm never going to buy a product from you again.

      • staticman2 a day ago ago

        I doubt in practice what you are saying is true. It would appear to disqualify owning a smart phone or a laptop.

        • igor47 10 hours ago ago

          I still regularly use very old laptops and phones. These devices don't stop functioning when they're disconnected from a cloud network.

  • layerdynamicsai a day ago ago

    Who woulda thought “one day, I might have little to zero control over your own thermostat” but here we are when planned obsolescence bleeds into everything it becomes pretty dystopian pretty quick.

  • 2 days ago ago
    [deleted]