7 comments

  • gnabgib 2 minutes ago ago

    In June. Source is a tweet from two weeks ago: https://x.com/atla_kouhou_en/status/1965701798448013737

    Previously: (27 points) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45227997

    Related: Japan releases image of Railgun installed on naval vessel (13 points) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43788741

  • janalsncm 2 hours ago ago

    What is the advantage of using a railgun over a hypersonic missile? Maybe cost, since even if they destroy their rails I assume those are cheaper to replace than a whole rocket?

    • helpfulfrond an hour ago ago

      From the article: "As railguns use electricity instead of explosive force, their projectiles are considered more durable and safer to store."

  • SilverElfin 3 hours ago ago

    I read that the US navy abandoned its rail gun efforts and the technology was deemed impractical. What changed that makes this railgun practical?

    • gpapilion 3 hours ago ago

      The issues were durability, fire rate, and well power.

      I don’t know that the first two have changed significantly.

    • KyleBerezin 2 hours ago ago

      Nothing from what I understand. The issue is material science. The rails have a very short life unless fired at far less than full power.

    • PicassoCTs 2 hours ago ago

      [dead]