28 comments

  • burkesquires an hour ago ago

    I think fraudsters should have to work off the money they stole at prison wages…punishments are supposed to be deterent and prevent people from commingting crime…don’t seal a billion dollars becasue IF you get caught you will have to pay back half is not a deterent…BUT if they have to pay off a billion dollars at 13-52 cents/hour…that is a deterent!

    • UqWBcuFx6NV4r 10 minutes ago ago

      That sounds like something you’d read in a Facebook comment. This is government-sanctioned slavery, and I strongly doubt that it would serve as a deterrent. People routinely put much more on the line for much less.

    • free_bip 41 minutes ago ago

      I wouldn't want to see that. That's called slavery!

      And no, the severity of the crime does not (IMHO) justify it.

      • empiko 8 minutes ago ago

        Just to play devil's advocate, you're okay with forcing a criminal to sit in a room for the rest of their life, but you're not okay if they also have to work for society during that timeframe. What is the main argument why the first case is okay and the second is not.

    • inamberclad an hour ago ago

      I'd like to see a prison sentence for corporations.

      • x3n0ph3n3 31 minutes ago ago

        I'd like to see the death penalty (dissolution) for them.

  • exabrial 2 hours ago ago

    > An Arizona man was sentenced Friday to 15 years in prison and ordered to pay more than $452 million in restitution for conspiring to defraud Medicare and other federal health care benefit programs of more than $1 billion by operating a platform that generated false doctors’ orders used to support fraudulent claims for various medical items.

    I wish all headlines read like this instead of "here's why you should be scared"

    • lixtra an hour ago ago

      As you would expect from a state press release, not a tabloid publication.

  • frinxor 29 minutes ago ago

    Seeing a lot of these pop up more recently, but this has been happening for a decade now apparently. Isn't this the fault of Medicare itself, of not having routine checks and better processes for preventing these fraudulent claims at the source?

    If only the big scams are being caught (and we don't know what % are being caught), there's likely a lot more going undetected.

  • xnx 4 minutes ago ago

    Is Trump going to pardon this guy like he did Salomon Melgen, who was convicted in 2017 of defrauding Medicare out of $73 million?

  • keernan an hour ago ago

    Why does he only have to repay 45%?

    • wredcoll an hour ago ago

      Article says medicaid only paid 300ish million on the claims.

  • rdtsc an hour ago ago

    > The fraudulent doctors’ orders generated by DMERx falsely represented that a doctor had examined and treated the Medicare beneficiaries when, in fact, purported telemedicine companies paid doctors to sign the orders without regard to medical necessity

    They'll get doctors as well? Hopefully they are part of the co-conspirators group they mentioned they convicted at the start. Criminals are going to be criminal, but it's especially disheartening when doctors engage in this. All those years going to school should be canceled and thrown into the trash immediately if they get convicted of these kinds of crimes. The path of ever being a doctor should be closed for them.

    • OutOfHere 14 minutes ago ago

      The problem here is not the doctors. It is billing it to government insurance. Doctors should remain free to gratify patients who are willing to pay cash rather than bill to government insurance. In fact, most such gratifications never have a problem for precisely this reason.

  • AndrewKemendo 2 hours ago ago

    I mean that’s pretty unabashed good news. I’m probably the most cynical person that comments regularly and I’ll take it!

    It’s something at least.

    • Cipater an hour ago ago

      You're nowhere near the most cynical peron here if your first thought wasn't "how long till he gets pardoned"?

      • atmavatar an hour ago ago

        My first thought was that the guy was required to pay back less than half of what was stolen.

        From there, of course, it's a short hop to "he has more than enough money left over to purchase himself a pardon."

        • Nevermark 22 minutes ago ago

          Well if he wasn't already contributing some percentage to the "right" people ahead of time, and saying the "right" things ("autism, something, something, vaccines, something something, persecution, ..."), he wasn't very good at what he did.

          Despite the great post-sentencing opportunities for monetary re-justicing, insurance still works better when paid for up front.

        • wombatpm 34 minutes ago ago

          Recent reports say the going price is a million

  • hermannj314 2 hours ago ago

    Does polymarket let you bet on when Trump pardons this guy?

    • rdtsc an hour ago ago

      It's your great chance to win big money! You should bet on it!

    • kQq9oHeAz6wLLS an hour ago ago

      Couldn't you go find out yourself? Or was your purpose to score some internet points with a snarky political jab?

      • garyfirestorm an hour ago ago

        Is it a ‘snarky political jab’ if it is highly likely to happen irl?

      • hermannj314 an hour ago ago

        It is a snarky political jab.

        President Trump loves to pardon white collar criminals in exchange for donations. It is his whole thing and well documented.

        • wombatpm 26 minutes ago ago

          The donations to his Presidential library are a scam. I’ve made this prediction elsewhere. I am 99% confident that the Trump Presidential Library will not be build during his lifetime. Further,I am 50 year old nonsmoker and I am 85% confident the Trump Presidential Library will not be built in my lifetime.

          I also expect the new East Wing Ballroom will not be built this term and the donations will mysteriously disappear with the next administration.

      • gregjw an hour ago ago

        It's funny when people are more upset about being called out than seeing the person they voted in do absurd things again and again.

      • nutjob2 42 minutes ago ago

        I guess you've never heard of a rhetorical question.

        But speaking of snark why are you so upset? Trump has form pardoning people for purely political reasons and for personal gain of various kinds.

  • jmyeet an hour ago ago

    Meanwhile, we have the former governor of Florida and now Seantor from Florida Rick Scott, who was CEO of the company successfully prosecuted for the largest Medicare fraud in history ($1.7 billion) [1].

    Here's what to watch: how long it takes for a donation to show up to the Trump library and how soon after that the sentence is commutted. This has erased roughly $1 billion in penalties so far since January 20. Hell, it might only take $1 million.

    [1]: https://www.justice.gov/archive/opa/pr/2003/June/03_civ_386....